La NASA idea un motor "warp".
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929300.300-meet-the-nasa-scientist-devising-a-starship-warp-drive.html#.UhOIFGR5xQY
Mola el comentario que hay más abajo que dice que bueno, al menos parece que no hace falta la masa de Júpiter en lágrimas de unicornio... pero sigue necesitando lágrimas de unicornio
En lugar de subvencionar a la CEOE deberíamos estar financiando ideas locas como estas
New Scientist escribió:
Even if travelling at warp speed is theoretically possible, don't the huge energy requirements make it unlikely?
When the idea was first proposed mathematically in 1994 it required a vast amount of negative vacuum energy which made the idea seem impossible. I did some work in 2011 and 2012 as part of the 100 Year Starship symposium and discovered ways to reduce the energy requirements by many orders of magnitude, so for a 10-metre diameter spacecraft with a velocity of 10 times light speed, I can reduce the negative energy needed.
If successful is the next stop Alpha Centauri?
We don't just go from the lab to an interstellar mission. There will be intermediate steps, other things we would do with this long before we get to some of the romantic pictures of a captain on the bridge telling the helmsman to engage warp drive.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21929300.300-meet-the-nasa-scientist-devising-a-starship-warp-drive.html#.UhOIFGR5xQY
Mola el comentario que hay más abajo que dice que bueno, al menos parece que no hace falta la masa de Júpiter en lágrimas de unicornio... pero sigue necesitando lágrimas de unicornio
En lugar de subvencionar a la CEOE deberíamos estar financiando ideas locas como estas