#5730 https://skepticalscience.com/underground-temperatures-control-climate.htm
Sírvanse buscar la refutación correspondiente a cada argumento en esta lista: https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Por cierto, no sé si estamos mirando adonde debemos, pero este no parece un mal sitio:
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
https://skepticalscience.com/anthrocarbon-brief.html
(antes mencionado aquí).
Sírvanse buscar la refutación correspondiente a cada argumento en esta lista: https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Por cierto, no sé si estamos mirando adonde debemos, pero este no parece un mal sitio:
https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence
Alguien escribió:The start of the growth in CO2 concentration coincides with the start of the industrial revolution, hence anthropogenic;
Increase in CO2 concentration over the long term almost exactly correlates with cumulative anthropogenic emissions, hence anthropogenic;
Annual CO2 concentration growth is less than Annual CO2 emissions, hence anthropogenic;
Declining C14 ratio indicates the source is very old, hence fossil fuel or volcanic (ie, not oceanic outgassing or a recent biological source);
Declining C13 ratio indicates a biological source, hence not volcanic;
Declining O2 concentration indicate combustion, hence not volcanic;
Partial pressure of CO2 in the ocean is increasing, hence not oceanic outgassing;
Measured CO2 emissions from all (surface and beneath the sea) volcanoes are one-hundredth of anthropogenic CO2 emissions; hence not volcanic;
Known changes in biomass too small by a factor of 10, hence not deforestation; and
Known changes of CO2 concentration with temperature are too small by a factor of 10, hence not ocean outgassing.
https://skepticalscience.com/anthrocarbon-brief.html
(antes mencionado aquí).
Naomi Klein. Podría haber puesto igual Martina Klein. Pensadora e influenser.